Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Editorial Policy: Difference between revisions

Current answers. Practical procedures. Reliable reference.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
EDFM initial deployment: seed initial page structure
 
Remove stale off-wiki file-path references now that Source Quality Guide and Content Style Guide are real wiki pages
 
Line 13: Line 13:
* Every article: {{tl|Article status}} near the top.
* Every article: {{tl|Article status}} near the top.


See also [[Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Verification Policy]], [[Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Source Quality Guide]] (`docs/source-quality-guide.md`), and [[Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Content Style Guide]] (`docs/content-style-guide.md`).
See also [[Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Verification Policy]], [[Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Source Quality Guide]], and [[Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Content Style Guide]].

Latest revision as of 22:15, 7 August 2026

How EDFM articles should be written.

Core principles

  1. Practical first. Field-manual tone: what to do, in what order, what to expect. Lead with the procedure, not the lore.
  2. No invented facts. If a gameplay detail (a number, a requirement, a mechanic's exact behaviour) isn't confirmed, say so explicitly using {{Unverified claim}} or {{Estimated information}} rather than stating it as fact.
  3. Version-aware. Elite Dangerous changes. Every gameplay-facing article should carry {{Article status}} recording the game version/mode it was last checked against.
  4. Live vs Legacy vs Historical are different things and must not be silently merged. Use {{Legacy warning}} / {{Historical warning}} rather than mixing eras in one paragraph without a flag.
  5. Plain, accessible language. Avoid unexplained jargon; where in-universe or community jargon is necessary, define it on first use.

Structure conventions

See also Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Verification Policy, Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Source Quality Guide, and Elite Dangerous Field Manual:Content Style Guide.